Coronary lesion complexity assessed by SYNTAX score in 256-slice dual-source MDCT angiography
Zeyneb Yuceler, Mecit Kantarci, Recep Sade, Yesim Kizrak, Berhan Pirimoglu, Ummugulsum Bayraktutan, Mecit Kantarci, Ibrahim Halil Tanboga, Enbiya Aksakal
article (Uluslararası, Hakemli) | Yazar(lar): Zeyneb Yuceler, Mecit Kantarci, Recep Sade, Yesim Kizrak, Berhan Pirimoglu, Ummugulsum Bayraktutan, Mecit Kantarci, Ibrahim Halil Tanboga, Enbiya Aksakal | Yıl: 2016 | Dergi/Kurum: DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY | İndeks: WOS.SCI | DOI: 10.5152/dir.2015.15298 — Öze
PURPOSE
The SYNTAX Score (SS) has an important role in grading the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing revascularization. Noninvasive determination of SS prior to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) might optimize patient management. We aimed to evaluate the agreement between ICA and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) while testing the diagnostic effectiveness of SS-MDCT.
METHODS
Our study included 108 consecutive patients who underwent both MDCT angiography with a 256-slice dual-source MDCT system and ICA within 14 +/- 3 days. SS was calculated for both ICA and MDCT coronary angiography. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association of SS-MDCT with SS-ICA, and Bland-Altman analysis was performed.
RESULTS
The degree of agreement between SS-ICA and SS-MDCT was moderate. The mean SS-MDCT was 14.5, whereas the mean SS-ICA was 15.9. After dividing SS into three groups (high [>= 33], intermediate [23-32], and low [<= 22] subgroups), agreement analysis was repeated. There was a significant correlation between SS-MDCT and SS-ICA in the low SS group (r=0.63, P = 0.043) but no significant correlation in the high SS group (r = 0.036, P = 0.677). The inter-test agreement analysis showed at least moderate agreement, whereas thrombotic lesions and the type of bifurcation lesion showed fair agreement.
CONCLUSION
The calculation of SS-MDCT by adapting SS-ICA parameters achieved nearly the same degree of precision as SS-ICA and was better than SS-ICA, especially in the low SS group.